Wednesday, September 15, 2021

Disney: Not What It Used To Be?






"The soul’s not there. The soul is what makes things grow..."
Frank Oz


Originally published on The Dreamcage.

I love Disney! This must be clearly understood. I grew up watching the Mouse House. Today, however, I fail to see the same company that I respected. Once upon a time there were great and fun movies like Tron, The Black Hole, The Journey of Natty Gann, Flight of the Navigator, Who Framed Roger Rabbit?, One Magic Christmas, Return to Oz, and of course the wonderful Herbie films. My childhood was protected in Disney bubble wrap. But I do wonder what has changed? Today, Disney seems to have lost its creative soul.

I'm certainly not going to step on the 'Disney ruined Star Wars' crap, as I don't really see it; Star Wars might not be as good as it used to be, but that's purely 'cause I'm seeing it through different eyes these days, not the innocent eyes of a naïve child. I certainly don't dislike what's being produced in the SW universe, though a little bit of new ground would be nice.

What I do see, sadly, is an obsession with remakes and unnecessary sequels. I still can't agree that Tron Legacy was needed, and it's a movie I've watched three times now - not because it's good but more for the hope that it'll improve with each viewing. Nope. Thankfully I still have the original.

Maybe I'm firmly stuck in a time capsule? But even legend Frank Oz has reportedly said that Disney lacks 'soul' these days. I have to agree with him. Today you just wouldn't see something like The Watcher In The Woods. Though not politically correct, I still have a fondness for One Of Our Dinosaurs Is Missing; I don't agree with book burning and I certainly have a dislike for 'cancelling' history, it's important to see yesterday in a certain way while facing today with a far more inclusive attitude - we are appalled by slavery and Roman Arena savagery but why ignore their footprints just because they leave a sour taste?

I digress. Looking at the movie catalogue of Disney over the past 20 years I don't see "classics" like there used to be in the 70-80s. Again, maybe it's my age. Maybe I've just overlooked some amazing original titles and need to dig deeper. But Mouse House does seem to advertise its bland franchises first, because... money.

I do feel like Pirates of the Caribbean might just be the only classic of the past twenty years.


Image via imdb.com.


Tuesday, September 1, 2020

The Walsh Journals - Exploring Star Wars: The Clone Wars






A long time ago in a galaxy far far away, Ayn Walsh starts an epic journey through the Star Wars: The Clone Wars animated series, currently streaming on Disney+


Originally published on The Dreamcage.


'Star Wars: The Clone Wars' has really expanded the galaxy and explored characters I had completely taken for granted in the Prequel Trilogy. Looking back, it's a missed opportunity that Jedi Masters such as Plo Koon and Aayla Secura weren't given proper screen time. Thankfully the animated series takes us back to that period in Star Wars history and gives us a glimpse of life beyond the Skywalkers.

I collect both Star Wars Attax trading cards and figures in the Black Series line but I've not often bought anything associated with Sith or Jedi who I don't recognise or have much knowledge of. Except, I'm really missing out because there are some fabulous characters in the franchise who aren't very well known unless you read Legends or watch either The Clone Wars or Rebels. For example, Thrawn was someone who totally went under my radar for far too long! If you don't know him, Thrawn is an Imperial tactician whose talents have helped him rise through the ranks. He's a threat to the rebel alliance and a cunning warrior.

This week I've started The Clone Wars: Season 1. It's been around for 12 years (TCW debuted in 2008) and I'm only just now 'discovering' it. Still, the computer animation is cute and the storytelling nothing short of spectacular. Though only about 25 minutes in length, each episode is tightly written with nice character development and plenty of space battles or lightsaber duels. One of my favourite characters is young Ahsoka Tano, Padawan to Anakin Skywalker - she's confident, wise and brave, and I know her story will evolve as she grows.

It's important not to get The Clone Wars mixed up with an animated series called 'Star Wars: Clone Wars' that was broadcast from 2003-2005, as they're not the same show! In fact, after Disney acquired the rights to Lucasfilm in 2012, the latter was made non-canonical. So, it's the 2008-2020 CGI fest that I'm accepting as Canon.

In 'A New Hope' it was once a mystery as to who the Jedi were. When referring to the lightsaber, Obi-wan said to Luke, "An elegant weapon for a more civilized age". The Jedi hermit also gave a mention to Darth Vader and how the Jedi were hunted down. George Lucas visualised these events in The Prequel Trilogy; we got to see the Jedi as observers and negotiators, peacekeepers and warriors. Because the films were focused on telling Anakin's fall to the Dark Side of the Force, we didn't get to see anything more. The Clone Wars rectifies this, being set between Episodes 2 (Attack of the Clones) and 3 (Revenge of the Sith).

Of course we do know how things will turn out: Palpatine will execute Order 66 and the Jedi will face the wrath of the Sith. Some are destined to survive - Ahsoka, Obi-wan, and Yoda are three of them! But life in the galaxy far, far away will never be the same again…

As my journey through this series continues I'll write up some more thoughts and discoveries. I'll try not to give away important spoilers but I'll flag such content if they shall rise. I'm already looking forward to the conclusion of Season 1.

MTFBWY — "The winding path to peace is always a worthy one, regardless of how many turns it takes."


Thursday, August 30, 2018

FilmLight - Star Wars: Beyond The Last Jedi




Rey and Kylo. Images source: starwars.com




In December 2017, I wrote 'Star Wars: A Return To Childhood'. Decided it was about time I revisited that piece and add further thoughts since Rian Johnson's contribution to George Lucas' created Universe...


A Galaxy For Fans Young And Old


I was three-years old When 'Star Wars: A New Hope' hit cinemas across the globe. It wasn't for a few more years that I was able to enjoy the magic of Luke Skywalker and his adventures in a galaxy far, far away. By then follow-up 'The Empire Strikes Back' had been given its cinematic release in 1980, and fans got to witness the shocking revelation that Darth Vader was more than just a dark lord of the Sith. The original trilogy concluded with a final on-screen battle between the Galactic Empire and Rebel Alliance, in 1983's 'Return of the Jedi'. It was a neat ending to a fabulous run of sci-fi movies. They had even spawned a toy line and other merchandise, cartoons and a couple of Ewok television films called 'Caravan of Courage: An Ewok Adventure' and 'Ewoks: The Battle for Endor'.

But it was the trilogy that stood the test of time.

It took over a decade for another trilogy to surface, this time prequel movies exploring the life and times of the Jedi Order, and the early years of Anakin Skywalker and Obi-One Kenobi. 'The Phantom Menace' arrived in 1999 to mixed reviews and opinions, some fans hating it outright. It did, however, become the first Star Wars for many young and old, introducing them to a Universe they would grow to embrace.

Between 2002 and 2005 came the inevitable sequels 'Attack of the Clones' and 'Revenge of the Sith', again either liked or disliked depending on a fan's relationship with the franchise at that time. I had not fully embraced the Prequel Trilogy back then either, though I didn't understand the dislike for Naboo resident Jar Jar Binks, who was simply a fun addition to 'The Phantom Menace'. I did feel the new instalments lacked firm direction, contained far too many weak scenes and dialogue, and some of the casting was questionable. In later years I've grown to appreciate these flicks as part of the whole, like finding the last three pieces in the jigsaw box and finally completing the puzzle. Perhaps they weren't necessary, but their existence doesn't ruin what came before.


The Petition


That is what really baffles me when I still hear phrases like "You've ruined my childhood" thrown about on social networking. This brings me nicely to the new trilogy, which began with The Force Awakens, in 2015. But the most shocking example of fan obsession comes with The Last Jedi, a movie directed by Johnson and one that has even seen a fan petition set up on Change.org to try and have it removed from Star Wars canon. Yes, this is a thing! Fan Henry Walsh started the petition to The Walt Disney Company 8 months ago, and it has (as of 11th August 2018) gained 109,782 signatures out of the 150,000 set. Not bad going.

Thankfully, these people don't speak for both myself and the other true fans who love this movie and its place in the franchise! I find it amusing that the petition states, "Episode VIII was a travesty. It completely destroyed the legacy of Luke Skywalker and the Jedi. It destroyed the very reasons most of us, as fans, liked Star Wars. This can be fixed. Just as you wiped out 30 years of stories, we ask you to wipe out one more, the Last Jedi. Remove it from canon, push back Episode IX and re-make Episode VIII properly to redeem Luke Skywalker's legacy, integrity, and character".

Well, it has been confirmed that actor Mark Hamill is returning to Chapter IX; his character is far from over. Perhaps Luke didn't die in The Last Jedi but simply transformed from one state to another, from physical to energy. It would be great to see him as a Force Ghost, joining the ranks of Obi-One, Yoda and Anakin Skywalker.






Luke Skywalker: Force Ghost


I'm not at all knowledgeable of the Star Wars Legends Universe, but a quick Google and I found something quite interesting. While reading about another character, Cade Skywalker, I noticed a quote from a scene involving Luke Skywalker as a Force Ghost, visiting Cade. During the visitation, Luke says, "Every generation has its challenges to face, its own battles to win. Why should yours be any different? Running away from your responsibilities won't solve anything!"

This is exactly how I see Luke's actions in The Last Jedi, running away from everything and embracing self exile to an island on the planet of Ahch-To, losing faith and confidence, feeling that the galaxy is better off without him. Following his encounter with young Rey, and a beautifully filmed sequence with Force Ghost Yoda, the Jedi Knight understands that very message: "Running away from your responsibilities won't solve anything!"

He later leaves the safety of Ahch-To and faces off against the First Order, buying time for his sister General Leia Organa and her band of resistance to escape an abandoned Rebel Alliance base before they are captured or killed. Luke's presence at the base is a Jedi trick, an illusion. He is later seen, still on his island, where he appears to fade like a ghost, physically and emotionally exhausted from the task of projecting his being far across space.

I always felt like there would be more to come.


An End To A Saga...


And with Star Wars: Episode IX in production, this time directed by J. J. Abrams (The Force Awakens being his first taste of the franchise), lose ends will get firmly tied, loved characters shall return, and the petition to erase The Last Jedi from canon will become irrelevant. To those fans who have nothing but admiration for Star Wars as a complete entity, no such petition means anything anyway.

May the Force be with you...



Friday, December 15, 2017

FilmLight - Star Wars: A Return To Childhood




BB-8 and R2-D2. Image source: starwars.com




I love movies! I’m extremely passionate about them. And like everyone I have my all time favourites, also understanding how deeply that passion goes. I’m not a fan of sequels or prequels that add nothing to the whole. Tron: Legacy, for example, left me cold. Joseph Kosinski’s 2010 sci-fi sequel to the far better Tron (1982) felt unnecessary and out of place, to me at least. But there are others who like it very much. I never complained on social media, or criticised those others by insulting them and making it personal. We all enjoy different things, and sometimes share equal passions. If we were identical in every way, boy would this Universe be boring! In childhood I remember seeing Star Wars: A New Hope for the very first time in the 1980s, not at the local theatre but on a pirated Betamax cassette tape. The magic of Steven Spielberg’s powerful cinematic tales captured my imagination, and so it wouldn't be unthinkable for George Lucas to achieve a similar feat. And Star Wars was such a skillful adventure, full of space battles, droids, a beautiful princess, a wise old man, the scoundrel and a young farm boy, all brought together by fate. As the years passed, further instalments came and went. But the magic, and fond memories, remained.

The trilogy ended with an evil Empire in ruin, and heroes celebrating. I owned Kenner action figures, and so reenacted my favourite moments. It was a beautiful time that will be cherished always. I grew up. And Lucas unleashed a new instalment trilogy opening with The Phantom Menace (1999). It was the first VHS purchased by me that year. I enjoyed it. Thankfully there was no internet then, so I wouldn’t be aware of any backlash from fans. No name calling, threats or the usual we sadly see today. Did I like it as much as the original trilogy? Perhaps not as deeply, though it still maintained a welcomed escapism from the real world. By the time of Revenge of The Sith (2005), my interest in the prequel series diminished quite a lot. And over the next few years I would join the internet, set up a website, and become actively involved in entertainment news and review writing.

Maybe I see much of the world through rose-tinted glasses, but I rarely slam a movie, instead preferring to look for the good points. If there are no good points to be found then I’d refrain from reviewing at all. I like to enjoy my work, so crucifying a film isn’t my thing. I’ll leave that to others. I also don’t go into a movie with great expectations that may never be delivered by the director. We all love to develop plotlines in our own heads, don’t we? “This is how it should have been” and “What a waste of a good idea”. “Why didn’t they do it my way?” Nowadays we’re all reviewers and filmmakers. We all know better than those whose job it is to bring the plot to screen.

In 2015, Star Wars: The Force Awakens hit theaters and introduced us to characters new and old. I was shocked by the murder of Han Solo (played so brilliantly by actor Harrison Ford since 1977). How dare they! I hate J. J. Abrams for letting this happen! Someone end his career before more childhoods are ruined! Seriously though, my childhood was never ruined, it remains intact as beautiful memories, and movies are a time machine, so I can easily go back and watch Luke, Han and Leia defeat the Empire as many times as I wish. Yes, I struggled seeing a favourite hero die in such a way, even today, but that is because I care about the character. I also acknowledge that time moves forward, situations and people change, one momentous victory can be replaced by yet another soul destroying battle. The end of Return of the Jedi wasn’t ruined, at least in my opinion, by the rising of the First Order and the events portrayed in The Force Awakens. It happens. Think of those who survived the First World War only to see the darkness rise again in 1939. They had once celebrated a victory, too. It may be only a sci-fi movie series, but Star Wars acts as a reminder that we shouldn’t take anything for granted, and that freedom and peace are precious. Celebrate today because we never know what tomorrow will bring.

I am yet to see The Last Jedi, though I have read spoilers (I won’t give anything away here). I have also witnessed a lot of negativity online, not just disappointment from true fans who had envisioned something different from director Rian Johnson, but real venom even directed in the path of other fans who have genuinely embraced the movie and its many twists and turns. As I have said, we are all different, and so there will always be diversity among the fanbase. Yes, fans are passionate, and wish to air any grievances; some reactions, however, are voiced in such a way that it is impossible, and depressing, to join online discussions these days. Remember, the cinematic experience is meant to be pleasurable escapism, and if you can’t enjoy it then at least respect that others are having the time of their lives. Why violate their own happiness and excitement by name calling and branding them as not “proper” fans? Yes, I know, “it’s the internet”.

I guess people will be people.

Cinema has always been about change. Sequels bring about a change in circumstances and ideals. What worked in one film might need a drastic turn of events in a follow-up. Nothing stays the same. It can’t. We grow older, and old classics do sit nice and comfortable in our hearts and memories. It is never easy letting go. But that’s why movies are time travel, while we are able to revisit those classics - nothing ever truly dies. Even Han Solo lives, just put in a DVD or Blu-ray of A New Hope and catch the magic.

No childhood is ruined. No franchise is destroyed. We can’t like every new instalment, but what we do love is still there, for the feels and chills.

And before you say it, yes I am not disregarding the changes George Lucas has made to the original trilogy. But, it is not the end of the world, some of those digital alterations actually look quite cool. What the fans want is a choice: original or special edition. That is likely to happen at some point in the near future, we just have to be patient. I’m thankful for Star Wars on Blu-ray regardless. Thankful to Lucas for making it happen, and grateful to those who keep the flame alive.

The Last Jedi will give opportunity for my child self to get out for a while, feel those tingles and experience something truly out of this world.


Friday, September 13, 2013

I Know Who Killed Me (2007) - FilmReview



Article author: Alwyn Ash

Child actor turns adult entertainer in a psycho-thriller written by Jeff Hammond.

For those who say Lindsey Lohan cannot act, I would almost be prepared to agree. However, there have been a small number of movies that have shown Lohan in a better light, and those are the moments when this actress shines best, given the right script and opportunity to put her skills into action. And, of course, when her colourful private life doesn't get in the way to distract from what really matters...

Known for her Disney connection (The Parent Trap, Herbie: Fully Loaded etc.), "I Know Who Killed Me" isn't the best film going, not when compared to far more maturer and meatier psychological hits like "Silence of the Lambs" (1991), "Orphan" (2009), and "Saw" (2004), but that is not to say that Chris Sivertson's second directorial doesn't hit the mark in some places. For a movie that received eight Golden Raspberry Awards, there is much going on in a feature that handles its plot like a wet fish - slippery logic.

The plot focuses on a serial killer, who kidnaps and tortures his young female victims. Lohan plays pretty Aubrey Fleming, a pianist and aspiring writer, who disappears during a night out. She undergoes the same torture. Later, however, she is discovered, unconscious and missing limbs. This is where everything changes, for now Aubrey claims to be Dakota Moss, a stripper. She certainly doesn't seem to recognise her "parents", the boyfriend or anything remotely relating to Aubrey's life.

Shock perhaps, resulting from the severe torture received at the hands of a maniac? No. As the film progresses we soon discover that Dakota believes she is a twin - to that of Aubrey. This alone does not explain how Dakota has received the wounds inflicted, until we realise that these two young women are Stigmatic Twins, who, due to a psychic connection, share similar experiences, including pain and injuries; this also explains why Aubrey has been writing a story about a girl called "Dakota".






As Dakota explains how she lost the use of her limbs, I did manage to find the loss of her finger particular strange - indeed, her reaction to this horrifying event seemed somewhat... I would say "underplayed", but quite frankly Lohan's delivery did leave a lot to be desired - she acted like it was more of a bloody inconvenience than a serious devastating loss! Still, that aside, the use of the "stigmatic" link was an intriguing plot device. As the story progresses, we learn that twins Aubrey and Dakota were born to crack addict Virginia Sue Moss. When Susan Fleming's newborn dies in the incubator, her husband Daniel makes a deal with Virginia and one of the twins is raised by both him and his wife - the latter, however, remains unaware of either her baby's death at the hospital or the swap, believing Aubrey to be her child.

Seeing as Aubrey has been missing since near the start of the movie, it is Dakota's duty to investigate and find her sister. It is a mystery as to why she is able to work out the serial killer's identity when the police cannot, given access to the same evidence. Still, where would we be if everything was wrapped up too quickly and neatly by a law enforcement agency? Lohan certainly isn't a strong actress, neither are her films memorable enough to be classics. But it is interesting to see her act "adult". This feature was clearly Lohan's attempt to shrug off her Disney image and show fans that she had matured enough to try something new. And, in part, it works fine.

If you are unfamiliar with Lohan's career then it is interesting to point out that the actress had played twin sisters once before, in the 1998 comedy "The Parent Trap". Based on the 1949 novel "Lottie and Lisa" by German author Erich Kästner (and serving as a remake of the 1961 Walt Disney film starring English actress Hayley Mills), the story focused on 11-year-old sisters Hallie Parker and Annie James who, separated at birth, accidentally meet at summer camp. In all honesty I prefer Lohan's version to the original 1961 feature.

"I Know Who Killed Me" certainly has taken some inspiration from several other movies, including "Saw". For those who are a little squeamish, stay clear of the madness and watch something less disturbing. However, gore fans will enjoy this, if they can accept Lohan's limitations and not get too distracted by the plot holes. Even with 2013 American erotic thriller "The Canyons" under her belt, and a portrayal of iconic film star Elizabeth Taylor in 2012 television film "Liz & Dick", one does wonder if Lohan can ever rediscover the success of her Disney days.

Purchase I Know Who Killed Me from the Store:
DVD - Running time: 105 minutes