Friday, September 27, 2013

The Witches (1966) - FilmReview



Article author: Alwyn Ash

"Throw in a satanic ritual and you almost have just the right ingredients to keep this Hammer film from falling foul of its own black magic."

There is much to thank Hammer Films for. Not only has the studio enriched British cinema but its influence continues to cast a spell to this present day. Growing up in England, I first discovered Hammer while watching one of the Dracula films starring Christopher Lee and Peter Cushing. I was mesmerized by powerful performances, vivid texture and haunting colour. Close to where I lived there had been a history of death, leprosy, plague, civil war and witchcraft, so I was in good company with local ghosts of the past, inspiring a fascination with the supernatural. Movies satisfied my hunger.

Though three decades old (at that time), the production of "Dracula" felt fresh and alive with purpose. I have been a fan ever since. Over the years I have enjoyed various titles, though I must admit I am far from seeing them all. It is hard to believe that this production company was founded in 1934 by William Hinds. Then known as Hammer Productions Ltd., Hammer's first production was "The Public Life Of Henry The Ninth", that very same year. And though many associate Hammer with horror, it is interesting to know that the studio has produced movies for various genres, including comedy. For some years after its final steps into mystery and suspense, there was a hiatus. However, a return with vampire horror "Let Me In" (2010), a remake of 2008 Swedish feature "Let the Right One In", spoke volumes: Hammer Films was back with a vengeance...

In 1966 director Cyril Frankel gave us "The Witches", a horror featuring what was to be actress Joan Fontaine's last big screen role. Restored and beautifully presented, StudioCanal has chosen wisely with its blu-ray and DVD combos, and this is no exception! Telling the story of Miss Gwen Mayfield's arrival in the quiet English village of Walwyk as new head teacher at the local school, "The Witches" for the most part works well as a British thriller, featuring an excellent cast. The sense of paranoia that permeates through the plot feels as stalking as the black cat (owned by the mysterious Granny Rigg) that creepily happens to keep a rather close eye on Gwen.







Fontaine as Gwen Mayfield could not have been better cast, her performance is grounded as a woman encountering a mystery who steadily unearths a devilish plot involving witchcraft. Those familiar with British sitcoms might just recognise the faces of Rudolph Walker ("Love Thy Neighbour", "Eastenders"), Leonard Rossiter ("Rising Damp"), and a young Michele Dotrice ("Some Mothers Do 'Ave 'Em"). No stranger to Hammer Films, actor Duncan Lamont also plays the role of butcher Bob Curd; I remember Lamont mostly for his performance in the 1974 Doctor Who serial "Death to the Daleks". Kay Walsh, too, is cast as Stephanie Bax, a very rich and influential lady; Walsh can be seen as Nancy in David Lean's 1948 masterpiece telling of "Oliver Twist", adapted from author Charles Dickens' classic tale.

"The Witches" is a feature that feels Hitchcock-esque in style and yet, fails to deliver an ending that compliments the film as a whole. There is less horror than you would expect, although as a thriller it is less needed. The mystery surrounding schoolgirl Linda Rigg (portrayed by Ingrid Brett, also known as Ingrid Boulting) remains the focus of the plot, as locals are determined to keep her away from a young village boy, who unexpectedly falls into a coma. Later, a missing doll is found - headless - and there is a death. Throw in a satanic ritual and you almost have just the right ingredients to keep this Hammer film from falling foul of its own black magic. Sadly, the ritual itself does not work so well, those actors involved in the ceremony looking more like locals from a dancing school with a choreography that is simply far too long and strange to be of any value.

Adapted from a 1960 novel "The Devil's Own" by Norah Lofts (published under the pseudonym Peter Curtis), the climax could have been better handled by Frankel and writer Nigel Kneale, though it has been purported that the latter (known for other hits including "Quatermass and the Pit") was unhappy with the final result, having included more humour in his script than was finally shown. Personally I am glad that "The Witches" remained serious, even if it delivered a far from satisfactory conclusion. On the balance, this is one film that was enjoyable, beautifully shot and, looking back, a reflection of quintessential England in a bygone era. Just one question, why is there a doll of singer/songwriter Paul McCartney in the movie poster pierced by pins? Perhaps the witch's power reaches beyond Walwyk?

In addition to the film, on the Blu-ray you will find a new documentary "Hammer Glamour", which takes a look at the Hammer girls through the years. Mixed in with classic footage, there are interviews with glamour girls Caroline Munro, Madeline Smith, Jenny Hanley, Valerie Leon, and Martine Beswick. It is a delight to hear their opinions of the show, and memories of working with other cast. One complaint, especially from Hanley, was the need for nudity in the Hammer movies - revealing too much flesh is something that actress Smith certainly seems to now regret (she starred in 1970's "The Vampire Lovers", opposite Ingrid Pitt), stating that she was young and naive in those early days of her career. In all, a rather intriguing forty-two minutes spent. And Munro looks as good as ever...

Purchase The Witches from the Store:
Blu-ray + DVD combo - Feature running time: 90 minutes

Or perhaps purchase the paperback - Publisher: Hammer


Saturday, August 31, 2013

Dracula AD 1972 - FilmReview



Article author: Alwyn Ash

Taking a look at the seventh in the successful Hammer Horror Dracula film series...

It has been described by some as one of the weakest in the Hammer Horror Dracula franchise. However I disagree. "Dracula AD 1972" has always been a favourite of mine since I first discovered it at the same time that I purchased "Satanic Rights of Dracula" on video tape. It is even possible that it was "Dracula AD 1972"'s appeal that led me to sampling and enjoying further Hammer tales. So what is it that excites about this movie? Firstly the casting, with Peter Cushing and Christopher Lee reprising their roles as Van Helsing and Dracula respectively; Cushing even gets to play two generations of the Van Helsing family: Lawrence in 1872 and descendant Lorrimer in 1972. Other cast include Christopher Neame as the mysterious Jonnny Alucard, and sex bombs Stephanie Beacham as Jessica Van Helsing and Caroline Munro as Laura Bellows certainly add to the attraction.

Secondly there is a freshness about "Dracula AD 1972" that permeates throughout the film, matched by a funky soundtrack written by fellow Manfred Mann member Mike Vickers. There is even a brief appearance by American band Stoneground.

The contemporary feel of 1970s London, with the upper class being invaded by hippies strikes a workable contrast to the film's opening fight sequence set in 1872 between Lawrence Van Helsing and Dracula - of course, the opening few minutes for the prologue do raise problems in the chronology of the Dracula film series: as the original Hammer Dracula 1958 motion picture was set in 1885, and Van Helsing had not even encountered Dracula until that year, how is it that Lawrence Van Helsing has managed to feature in the 1872 opening scene battling a vampire he was yet to meet? To be fair, I didn't even realise this piece of trivia until researching both Hammer movies - it has been some years since I last watched the 1958 outing directed by Terence Fisher...

Though Hammer had been known for its contemporary productions, "Dracula AD 1972" was a considerable jump from what had gone before compared to period pieces such as "Horror of Dracula", "Dracula: Prince of Darkness" (1966) and "Taste the Blood of Dracula" (1969).







Something that should be acknowledged is that Peter Cushing's original Van Helsing does not even seem to share the same name as his 1897 novel counterpart, Abraham Van Helsing. In "The Horror of Dracula" he is simply referred to as Doctor Van Helsing; its sequel "Brides of Dracula" (1960) suggests his name to be "J. Van Helsing", though perhaps the "J" was a reference to a middle name? Still, the only explanation for "Lawrence" in "AD 1972" is that Cushing's Van Helsing in the 1958 feature had been called "Lawrence" and not "Abraham". Taking this in mind, "Doctor Lawrence J Van Helsing" makes the most sense.

And so back to director Alan Gibson's offering... The prologue gives us a battle between Count Dracula and Van Helsing, and the final death of our vampire slayer. As Lawrence is laid to rest ("Requiescat In Pace Ultima"), one of Dracula's disciples buries some of his master's ashes nearby. Cue title sequence and we are now one hundred years forward, in 1972. How nice that both the disciple and Lawrence's descendants look identical to their ancestors, allowing the same actors to play both parts. Though in a contemporary setting, Peter Cushing's character remains the same elegant and charming gentleman. As previously mentioned, among the young cast is Neame as Johnny Alucard, whose fascination with the occult is more than just a passing phase: he hopes to raise the dark lord, and serve under him.

Dracula's hatred for the Van Helsing family is so strong that he wishes to turn Jessica Van Helsing (Beacham) into a vampire, and his bride! Very surprising that he didn't keep Laura as a bride too - such a waste! Munroe did, however, feature in another Hammer film as Carla, a Gypsy girl in "Captain Kronos – Vampire Hunter", released in 1974.

Perhaps a small part now, but one of the interesting characters in "Dracula AD 1972" is Inspector Murray (played by Michael Coles - who also starred opposite Peter Cushing in the 1965 feature-length "Dr. Who and the Daleks" as a Thal, Ganatus). Though he doesn't have much to do in this production, Murray does return for the follow-up "Satanic Rites of Dracula", in which he plays a more prominent role.

For those who still believe "Dracula AD 1972" to be poor, it was surely more of a shame that the 1974 feature "The Legend of the 7 Golden Vampires" featured Peter Cushing once more as Lawrence Van Helsing, in 1904 - thirty-two years after he was supposed to have perished? Perhaps "Legend of... Vampires" was trying its best to wipe away any trace of the two films that had preceded it, or am I missing something? Whatever the reason, Gibson at least managed to update a tiring film franchise with his direction, even if it divided fans in the process. At heart, this is simply a fun movie.

Purchase Dracula AD 1972 from the Store:
DVD - Running time: 92 minutes